<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02378nam a22002057a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001E000158</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20201127105647.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">201127b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Correlation study between erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase activity, serum malondialdehyde and insulin sensitivity in agricultural workers and non-agricultural workers in Nat-Kan Village, Magway Township /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Mya Pwint Phyu [and four others]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Objective. This study determined the correlation between erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity, serum malondialdehyde (MDA) and insulin sensitivity in agricultural workers and non-agricultural workers.

Methodology. The cross-sectional comparative study was undertaken in 45 agricultural and 45 non-agricultural workers from Nat-Kan Village, Magway Township. Erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase activity and serum malondialdehyde were measured by spectrophotometric method. Insulin sensitivity was calculated by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR).

Results. Mean erythrocyte AChE activity was significantly lower in agricultural (3553.99 IU/L) compared with nonagricultural workers (4432.68 IU/L) (p&lt;0.001). A significant high level of mean serum MDA was observed in agricultural workers (0.74 versus 0.28 &#x3BC;mol/L, p&lt;0.001). Median HOMA-IR value was significantly higher in agricultural (2.74) than that of non-agricultural workers (2.28) (p&lt;0.05). The risk of insulin resistance was 2.8 times greater in agricultural workers than non-agricultural workers (OR 2.8, 95% CI, 1.18 to 6.72). Erythrocyte AChE activity had weak negative correlation with serum MDA level (r=-0.357, p&lt;0.001) and HOMA-IR (&#x3C1;= 0.305, p&lt;0.05). There was a significant but weak positive correlation between serum MDA level and HOMA-IR (&#x3C1;=0.355, p&lt;0.001).

Conclusion. Organophosphate pesticide exposure lowered erythrocyte AChE activity and increased oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is partly attributed to the development of insulin resistance.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In: Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies, 2020 Vol. 35 (1) pages: 85-92</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Phyu, Mya Pwint </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hlain, Zarchi Theint Theint </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Zaw, Thurein </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Htway, Soe Minn </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sein, Mya Thanda </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://asean-endocrinejournal.org/index.php/JAFES/article/view/645/1289</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">1870</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1870</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ElectronicRes</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2020-11-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">E000158</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">D0001E000158</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2020-11-27 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2020-11-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
