<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02487nam a22002417a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001E000157</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20201127113305.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">201127b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Glycemic patterns and factors associated with post-hemodialysis hyperglycemia among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan [and four others]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Introduction. Chronic and post-prandial hyperglycemia are independent risk factors for diabetic complications.
Glycemic patterns among hemodialysis end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) differ as glucose metabolism changes with
declining kidney function with more pronounced glycemic fluctuations. The objectives of this study are to determine
glycemic patterns on hemodialysis days, the magnitude of post-hemodialysis rebound hyperglycemia (PHH) and
their associated factors.
Methodology. 148 patients on hemodialysis were analysed, 91 patients had end-stage-diabetic-renal disease
(DM-ESRD), and 57 patients had end-stage-non-diabetic renal disease (NDM-ESRD). Glycemic patterns and PHH
data were obtained from 11-point and 7-point self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) profiles on hemodialysis and
non-hemodialysis days. PHH and its associated factors were analysed with logistic regression.
Results. Mean blood glucose on hemodialysis days was 9.33 [SD 2.7] mmol/L in DM-ESRD patients compared to 6.07
[SD 0.85] mmol/L in those with NDM-ESRD (p&lt;0.001). PHH occurred in 70% of patients and was more pronounced
in DM-ESRD compared to NDM-ESRD patients (72.5% vs 27.5%; OR 4.5). Asymptomatic hypoglycemia was
observed in 18% of patients. DM-ESRD, older age, previous IHD, obesity, high HbA1c, elevated highly-sensitive CRP
and low albumin were associated with PHH.
Conclusion. DM-ESRD patients experienced significant PHH in our cohort. Other associated factors include older
age, previous IHD, obesity, high HbA1c, elevated hs-CRP and low albumin.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In: Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies 2020 vol. 35 (1) pages: 68-76</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Renal Dialysis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Diabetes Complications</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Hyperglycemia</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">complications</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Risk Factors</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Glycemic Variability</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nor Fadhlina Zakaria</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Muhammad Adil Zainal Abidin </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://asean-endocrinejournal.org/index.php/JAFES/article/view/769/1285</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">1871</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1871</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ElectronicRes</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2020-11-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">E000157</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">D0001E000157</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2020-11-27 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2020-11-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
