<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02385nam a22001937a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001J000076</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210219132005.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210219b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Comparative analysis of the classic Lachman's test with the drop leg Lachman's test /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Dilbert A. Monicit and Ambrosio Emilio S. Valdez III</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the validity of the Drop Leg Lachman's test (DLLT) with Lachman's test (LT) in appreciating abnormal knee AP laxity using KT-1000, specifically comparing LT and DLLT in terms of sensitivity and specificity.


METHODS: A prospective randomized cross-sectional study was used on 36 patients complaining of unilateral knee symptoms from April 2009 to November 2009, 18 to 50 years of age consulting at the UP-PGH Department of Orthopedics Sports Clinic. Descriptive statistics were used to obtain the frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation and range. Data was analyzed and calculated using the KT-1000 and STATA software.


RESULTS: The subjects included 31 (86%) males and 5 (14%) females. Thirty-six percent were students and the rest were employed. The average age of the subjects was 28 years old with a range from 17 to 50 years. Their average weight was 72 kilograms with a range of 50 to 92 kilograms. Their average height was 170 centimeters with a range of 157-187 centimeters. Twenty eight (78%) complained of knee pain, 7 (17%) of knee instability and 1 (2%) of knee tightness. All of the subjects attribute the current complaint to a previous trauma, 72% were basketball-related. The average duration of onset of symptoms to testing was 22 months. Our study showed identical results of 95.45% sensitivity and 50.0% specificity when DLLT and LT were compared to KT-1000.


CONCLUSIONS: The Drop Leg Lachman's test shows no statistical difference with that of Lachman's Test in diagnosing knee instability using the KT-1000 as gold standard. It has an identical transitivity of 95.45 % and specificity of 50%.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In: Acta Medica Philippina, 2012 vol 46 (2) pages: 13-18</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Drop Leg</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Monicit, Dilbert A. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Valdez, Ambrosio Emilio S. </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">III</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://actamedicaphilippina.upm.edu.ph/index.php/acta/article/view/2149/1564</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2983</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2983</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">nlm</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ElectronicRes</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2021-02-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">J000076</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">D0001J000076</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2021-02-19 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2021-02-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
