<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02322nam a22002057a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001J000160</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210312144149.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210312b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Evaluation of the serologic test cobas core anti-h.pylori EIA in the diagnosis of helicobacter pylori infection /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Venancio I. Gloria [and three others]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Objective: to determine the validity of the Cobas Core Anti-H. pylori EIA serologic test in the diagnosis of helicobacter pylori infection in an independent and blind comparison with histology of gastric antrum biopsy specimens as the gold standar. Design: Cross-sectional standard criterion study. Setting: The study was conducted at the Out Patient Department Endoscopy Unit of UP-PGH, tertiary care Hospital. Patients/Participants: Three hundred (300) consecutive patients who satisfied the following inclusion and exclusion criteria: 10 male or female age 18-80 years with indications for upper gutendoscopy; (2) with written informed consent to be included in the study (in all aspects) and to undergo upper gut endoscopy with biopsy. Exclusion Criteria: 1) intake of antibiotics, bismuth compund. H2 blockers or proton pump inhibitors within 4 weeks prior entry; 2) prevous resective gastric surgery; 3) pregnancy; 4) caustic ingestion; 5)illness or other contraindications that preclude safe endoscopy. Interventions: all included patients were subjected to two interventions: 1) upper gut endoscopy with biopsy of the gastric antrum for histologic examination: and 2) blood extraction of five (5) milliliter for the serologic test. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios were calculated for the serologic test and the prevalence rate of H. pylori in the study was likewise determined. Results: The sensitivity and the specificity for the serologic test were 89.25% and 80.70% respectively. Likelihood ratios, positive and negative, for the same test were 4.62 and 0.13, respectively. Prevalence rate of H.pylori was 62.0%.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Acta Medica Philippina, 2000 36 ( 1&amp;2 ) pages 27-33</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Helicobacter pylori</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Serologic Tests</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gloria, Venancio I. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Daez, Ma. Lourdes O. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Fernandez, Arnold </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dimacali, Andrew D. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">3474</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">3474</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">nlm</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ElectronicRes</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2021-03-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">J000160</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">D0001J000160</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2021-03-12 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2021-03-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
